![]() Also, a large rounded portion of the building seems to recall the exterior wall of an Italian Romanesque church apse. The many evenly spaced windows of its body mirror the Sienese structure’s arched ones, also set in a molded brick facade. The basic structure bears striking similarities to Siena’s Palazzo Pubblico, with its impossibly lean tower stretching heavenward. The exterior offers a modern interpretation of Italian Renaissance architecture. Kansas architectural firm Van Brunt and Howe’s original exterior remains much the same as it was at the time of its completion in the late 1890s, even though the interior experienced substantial modification in the remodeling of the late 1920s. Though originally the dream of German-born railroad tycoon Henry Villard in 1881, his bankruptcy in 1883 suspended the building of the station until the beginning of the next decade. James Barratt, Elizabeth Neal, and Katrina Padre, Medieval Portland Capstone Student, Medieval Portland Walking Map Project, Fall 2011 My original design for this looked much different (see the third image in the gallery above), but when I reworked it in a second draft to tighten up some spacing, I decided to work with a black background that is somewhat reminiscent of TriMet’s new signage on the downtown Transit Mall (see the last image above).Van Brunt, Henry (American architect, 1832-1903)Ĩ00 Northwest 6th Avenue, Portland, Oregon However, these diagrams are always a trade-off between geographical accuracy and clarity – I think I’ve struck a good balance between the two. One minor problem with the diagram is the huge amount of distortion the further away from the city centre you get: Wilsonville should be way off the bottom of the diagram, and should be shown as being on the banks of the Willamette River, as should the stations near Milwaukie. This more accurately reflects the geography of Portland’s downtown, where the MAX tracks form a distinctive “cross shape” as they all converge on Pioneer Courthouse Square. Unusually, I decided to use 30- and 60-degree angles for this diagram, instead of the usual 45 degrees. If the Blue Line can keep the same colour for its entire length, so can the Yellow Line. ![]() Arbitrarily ending the southbound Yellow Line at Union Station and changing the train to an Orange Line train for the rest of its southbound journey doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. I’ve also shown Amtrak routes and the Aerial Tram for the sake of completeness, even though they fall somewhat out of the scope of the main purpose of the diagram.Īlthough many people are unofficially calling the Portland–Milwaukie light rail project the “Orange Line”, I’ve decided to show it as extension of the Yellow Line. Works in very early planning stages, such as the Lake Oswego Streetcar extension, are not shown. This includes the Portland–Milwaukie light rail extension, the full Portland Streetcar loop and the extension of the MAX Yellow Line into Vancouver over the new I-5 bridge. My diagram shows the TriMet/Streetcar system when all currently proposed work has been completed. As both systems honour each other’s fares, there’s absolutely no reason not to show both systems on one diagram. As the Streetcar is currently expanding across the Willamette River in the form of the Streetcar Loop, I feel it is even more important to show its full extent and interaction with TriMet’s services. The official diagram only shows TriMet’s services – the MAX light rail and WES commuter rail – relegating the important Portland Streetcar to a pathetic, unlabelled, light brown squiggle through downtown. Portland is blessed with fantastic public transportation, but I’ve always felt that the official TriMet system diagram fails to fully show this, even after its recent redesign. Here’s a new transit diagram that I’ve been working on for a while now – a unified rail transit map for the place I live, Portland, Oregon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |